Thursday, January 29, 2015

Where Are Winston Churchill And Ronald Reagan When We Desperately Need Them?

Only 25% polled believe that it's safer in America under Obama---and they meant safer here for the terrorists...WH Press Secretary Tweet





  • As early as 1932, Winston Churchill warned the world about Germany's rearmament.  In fact, he was considered by many now the lone voice in cautioning everyone about the dangers of the upcoming Gathering Storm the title of his first book that described his opposition to the appeasement of Hitler in the 1930's. The central theme of his book targeted the futility of appeasement and the need to stand up to dictators. After his forewarning, Hitler invaded Poland on Sept. 1, 1939. It was the start of WWII.
  • Even before Ronald Reagan challenged the the Soviet Union to "tear down this wall," he counseled free democracies about the dangers of Communism. In his 1983, "Evil Empire Speech," he targeted Communism as the "focus of evil in the modern world."
  • I bring up those two great examples of strength and influence because of what came out of the WH yesterday. Just when you thought the Obama administration could not surprise you again, there's this. At the WH presser, deputy press secretary Eric Schultz actually stated that the Taliban is not a terrorist group. He referred to them as an "armed insurgency." To the credit of the media, Schultz was challenged about that absurd statement. Moreover, if Eric Schultz were caught by the Taliban, he'd learn quickly what kind of terrorist group it is.
  • But this should come as no surprise to any rational observer of this administration's many foreign policy blunders . Remember, it was just last summer when the Obama administration released five battle-hardened Taliban terrorists in exchange for Bergdahl. (It's being reported he will be charged with desertion).
  • Perhaps the WH also needs a reminder that it was just over a month ago when Taliban terrorists attacked a school in Pakistan and murdered about 126 people, many of whom were children. And has the Obama administration already forgotten about the 10+ years our troops fought against the Taliban in Afghanistan many of whom died in that war? Even prior to September 11, 2001, the UN attributed at least a dozen massacres to the Taliban. The UN also reported the Taliban were responsible for most of the deaths of civilians in Afghanistan. These terrorists actually placed IED's in many schools and targeted unarmed aid workers usually by suicide bombings.
  • But then again, it's this administration and the progressive elites who always try to keep reminding us that Islamist terrorism has nothing to do with Islam even though the Islamist themselves have always taken credit for these barbaric attacks. 
  • Churchill and Reagan knew the dangers of political correctness and appeasement. In Churchill's case, few heeded his warnings. We know the outcome of those concessions. Even today, most of civilized society has awaken to the threat of Islamist terrorism. It's only unfortunate and to the detriment of the lives of millions that many of those in leadership positions have not including those currently residing in the White House and too many in Congress.
Postscript: It was reported today that Obama's JV team burned the Jordanian pilot alive.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Progressives Despise America's Heroes Yet Continue To Embrace Despots And Tyrants

This guy is still laughing at Michael Moore and his ilk...My Tweet this week with image and caption below







  • Last summer, I took some heat from the left side of the political isle for a piece I wrote. In it and contrary to what they want us to believe, I made the case (successfully) that many progressive despise our military and veterans. 
  • For example, in 2009, the Obama administration published a report entitled, "Right Wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." The report was not directed at the recruitment of Islamist. No, it focused on veterans.  In fact, this absurd report actually stated, "returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right wing extremists." Not long after that report, a WH press aid Tweeted that Bergdahl may have been justified in deserting because, according to this nitwit, his platoon mates might have been "psychopaths." (It was reported today that Bergdahl would be brought up on charges of desertion).
  • In the last several months, we've even witnessed progressive NYC Mayor de Blasio maligning the NYPD. In fact, he even joined forces with Al Sharpton, a pompous, race-baiting and cop-bashing thug.
  • So recent reports of Michael Moore and his ilk maligning the memory and legacy of Chris Kyle should come as no surprise to any rational thinking Americans. Progressive can't help it. It's in their DNA. That same mind-set is was projected this week in their hateful and hostile attitude toward Israel's Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu when John Boehner announced Bibi would be invited to speak before Congress. The WH and its enablers are livid that Boehner didn't give them a heads-up for this engagement.  Of course, they fail to point out the WH has treated Netanyahu with disdain in recent years. Moreover, with our separation of powers,  Boehner does not need the permission of the WH to invite speakers before Congress.
  • The fact is progressives have long had a love affair with despots and tyrants. Che and Castro remain their heroes to this day. In the past, I've written about Melissa Mark-Viverito, Speaker of NYC's Council, and her love affair with domestic terrorists like the FALN. Just last week, Viverito eulogized convicted terrorist Rosado Morales. Morales, who died at age 107, was imprisoned three times for seditious acts. The last time was in 1954 when she was involved in a plot that concluded with an attack on Congress by four Puerto Rican nationalists. That attacked resulted in the wounding of five U.S. congressmen. Keep in mind, Viverito proceeded with this eulogy a few days after the Paris attacks.
  • Recently the editorial staff of the NY Post summarized it this way: "So much for all the talk supporting our troops. Then again, we never really believed them in the first place, did we?" Of course not.