DNC Shields Clinton From Public View With Saturday Night Debates

I Am Fun...Commentary by Hillary Clinton in The Onion

This post is not meant to alert you to another Democrat debate. As far as I'm concerned, they're a joke. The fix is in for Hillary Clinton. It has been for the last 4 years.

The post is meant to show you what lengths the DNC will go to shield Clinton from the American public. The debate---as well as others---will be held on Saturdays. To give you some idea how devious the Democrats and their enablers in the media are when it comes to keeping her under the media radar consider this Saturday's activities:

• Less than 1 week before the Christmas holiday and associated shopping.
• Seven college bowl games.
• NFL with Jets vs. Cowboys (a must-win for NY).
• About 20 college basketball games.
• Today's opening of the latest "Star Wars" film.

And who was responsible for setting up this schedule? None other than Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz who just happened to be Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign manager.

The NY Post pointed this out well with their editorial: "...the last thing her supporters want is for the American public to hear what she has to say." Although I would add: Everything---everything she says is a bold-faced lie anyway.

The Folly Of Confidence In Government Vetting

You call these latest incidents "terrorism."  We liberals call them "gun control conversation starters."   WH Press Secretary Tweet (satire)

The government wants to import thousands of refugees from Syria. At the same time, they want to allay any anxieties we have about the vetting process.  "Don't be concerned," they say. "We know what we're doing."  Only a fool would believe that especially in the face of the last 7+ years of hyper incompetence exhibited by this administration (and others before them). Some examples that should make you reconsider any confidence you may have in our government:

• Tashfeen  Malik, one of the terrorists in San Bernadio, had been posting radical statement on Facebook for almost 3 years. In addition, she passed at least 3 background checks before immigrating to the U.S. from Pakistan (a sanctuary country for terrorism).
• What's worse? The policy of Homeland Security is to refrain from checking public postings like FB---it is their policy and a fear of  "bad public relations."---for whom?
• As the administration announced it plans on importing thousands of Syrian refugees, ISIS bragged that they would exploit the refugee process to infiltrate the West.
• It's also been reported ISIS is now able to create passable passports
• Just recently, FBI director James Comey admitted it's not possible to do thorough background checks of 1000's of Syrian refugees. In particular, many of these refugees are not on any known database. How can there be in a country ravaged by war as Syria?

In other words, extensive so-called "vetting" didn't prevent what occurred in San Bernadino. It also didn't prevent what occurred on 9/11 as well as the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. Ramzi Yousef was the mastermind of the 1993 attack and was the nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the terrorist who planned the attack on 9/11. Most of the attackers had questionable immigration and visa documents.

These examples and countless others show clearly that the government's vetting process is less than encouraging. In fact, with few exceptions, it's foolish to think this government and administration can do anything well.

Postscript:  Since this was posted, how's that vetting working for Germany and France?

H.Clinton---like Obama---Cannot Escape From Her Ideological Straightjacket

"Hillary Clinton To Nation: 'Do Not Fuck This Up For Me.'" The Onion

Last week, I challenged the media to ask Hillary Clinton just three questions----

• Have you ever told the American people the truth?
• Why is your first impulse to reach for a lie?
• Why should anyone believe you?

Of course, the media that's cloaked her and Obama in bubble wrap for years will never ask her any of those important questions. They won't because they know she's incapable of telling the truth. They also know----like themselves---she is unable to escape from her ideological straitjacket.

We've watched this phenomena with Obama for the last 7+ years. He's so entrenched in warped progressive ideology; he's even unable to name the enemy. Clinton, who served as his Secretary of State, exhibited the same distorted view of foreign policy. For example, we now know her tenure was a conspicuous failure even though most of the media fail to admit it. After all, it's been during her tenure and Obama's that terrorists like ISIS have declared a jihad across the globe----even reaching into our own nation.

So knowing all of this and more, I'm obliged to ask another even more important question of Hillary Clinton: Why should any American trust you with the security of our nation? After all, you couldn't even protect the life of one ambassador in Benghazi.

Obama, Clinton and the media would have made even Houdini envious.

Note: Since this was posted, the Benghazi Report was released reinforcing HRC's countless lies.  And The Comey Hearing also reinforced her deceit.